History of Ethics, Moral, Virtue, Value and Values in Quotes

Kant held that ordinary moral thought recognized moral duties towardourselves as well as toward others. Hence, together with thedistinction between perfect and imperfect duties, Kant recognized fourcategories of duties: perfect duties toward ourselves, perfect dutiestoward others, imperfect duties toward ourselves and imperfect dutiestoward others. Kant uses four examples in the Groundwork, oneof each kind of duty, to demonstrate that every kind of duty can bederived from the CI, and hence to bolster his case that the CI isindeed the fundamental principle of morality. To refrain from suicideis a perfect duty toward oneself; to refrain from making promises youhave no intention of keeping is a perfect duty toward others; todevelop one’s talents is an imperfect duty toward oneself; andto contribute to the happiness of others is an imperfect duty towardothers. Again, Kant’s interpreters differ over exactly how toreconstruct the derivation of these duties. We will briefly sketch oneway of doing so for the perfect duty to others to refrain from lyingpromises and the imperfect duty to ourselves to develop talents.

Moral autonomy combines will and reason.

Teaching moral values to a child are usually the responsibility of the parents.

William James: The Moral Equivalent of War

If the government was not functional they will collapse, and if the community was not cooperative with its government, the idea of a government will simply fade, but in order to have this mutual relationship some moral values must be set up in between them....

The Moral Equivalent of War William James 1910 Introduction

In today’s society, moral values, rules, norms, and sanctions affect the decisions made by individuals and over time, define the kind of person they chose to become.

Moral goodness expresses in an essentially new and higher sense of the idea of value as such; 4.

The Moral Instinct - The New York Times

Kant’s account of the content of moral requirements and thenature of moral reasoning is based on his analysis of the unique forcemoral considerations have as reasons to act. The force of moralrequirements as reasons is that we cannot ignore them no matter howcircumstances might conspire against any other consideration. Basicmoral requirements retain their reason-giving force under anycircumstance, they have universal validity. So, whatever else may besaid of basic moral requirements, their content is universal. Only auniversal law could be the content of a requirement that has thereason-giving force of morality. This brings Kant to a preliminaryformulation of the CI: “I ought never to act except in such away that I could also will that my maxim should become a universallaw” (G 4:402). This is the principle which motivates a goodwill, and which Kant holds to be the fundamental principle of all ofmorality.

Essay: Russian Cultural Values - The School of Russian …

The asymmetry between egoistic and altruistic moral aestheticism, that one is a fallacy and the other isn't, is due to the circumstance that morality limits the pursuit of self-interest and posits respect for others. The removal of moral constraint in aestheticism thus would be motivated for the self, which can then gain through wrong, but would not be motivated for others, who were protected from wrongful loss.

Values dress a person from the beliefs of their ancestors to civilized ideas.

Free moral values Essays and Papers - 123HelpMe

I believe in one God, and no more. I do not believe in the creed professed by the Jewish church, by the Roman church, by the Greek church, by the Turkish church, by the Protestant church, not by any church that I know of. My own mind is my own church.

Moral Values Essay - 1267 Words | Cram

It is a shame that Nelson errs when it comes to the content of the moral law, but this provides an important lesson how mistakes can be made even in the context of a theory that is sound and fruitful.

Moral Values: Importance of Moral Values in Student Life

On the other hand, an "altruistic moral aestheticism" [or, simply, "altruistic aestheticism"] is not a moral fallacy; for this only means that a person may act for the good of others if this seems good, which is unobjectionable as long as the action respects the autonomy of others, i.e.