However, Abortion is necessary in many cases.

During his first term on the Supreme Court, Justice Neil Gorsuch has in many ways shown himself to be a kindred spirit to the late Justice Antonin Scalia. Justice Gorsuch—like his predecessor—is an originalist, which means that he seeks to ascertain the original meaning of the constitutional text and to apply it faithfully. But one wonders: will Justice Gorsuch distinguish himself by being a more consistent originalist with respect to the constitutional status of abortion?

Persuasive Essay: Pro-Choice Abortion | b3ccadee

Pro-life and pro-choice advocates beliefs on abortion differs morally, lawfully and ethically.

NRLC Pro-Life Essay Contest | National Right to Life

"The Silent Scream" was also intended, I believe, to argue that thefetus resists being aborted and by doing so shows that even an early embryohas a will to live and/or is aware of efforts to end its life. There ismedical neurological argument to the contrary, but that is perhaps questionabletoo. I would rather argue that the apparent resistance to abortion is farless likely a sign of awareness of what is going on than it is some sortof reflex or reaction to a specific stimulus. Babies or children (and evenadults) sometimes draw away from or seem to resist stimuli without havingany reason for it, and sometimes are even attracted to things which arefatal or painful. In fact, it is often very difficult to get children tounderstand about death and that certain things can kill them or hurt themvery badly. Trying to teach children to be careful around cars, for example,is not an easy task. I find it difficult to believe that an embryo hasan understanding of death and danger that a child does not.

National Right to Life 2018 Pro-Life Essay Contest

[Let me point out that abortion on grounds of self-defense canonly refer to self-defense against loss of life or severe damage to health,not something like loss of a little happiness or a slightly longer recoveryperiod. You may justifiably kill someone you reasonably believe would otherwisekill you or badly hurt you, but you cannot justifiably kill someone whoyou know would otherwise only lower your standard of living a bit. Thisis not to say there may be no other grounds for abortion.]

Others are Pro Life, and say that abortion is unethical and is considered as a form of homicide.
I feel that the pro-life side of this argument needs to be addressed and further explained.

The Social Conflict of Abortion Essay -- Abortion - …

I also wish to discuss these kinds of cases of abortion not only inregard to science and society as they are at this writing, but as to howsocietal or social perspectives might be philosophically modified and howmedical science is likely someday to be, the latter in ways that will bringwhole new problems to the question of abortion -- as well as whole newsolutions. The particular medical science developments I wish to take intoaccount are those of transplant or machine maintenance of a human embryo(though particularly a later stage embryo, which as of this writing isstill not medically feasible; transplant is already done in other animals,notably cattle); and the particular social perspective changes I wish totake into account are (1) some sort of "nurturing" assistance for the childrenof educationally and socially disadvantaged families -- not necessarilyjust "ghetto" families and not necessarily welfare nor governmental assistance,but personal relationships and mentoring that will give expectation thata child will not have to be born into such a hopeless or terrible situationthat an abortion might be better for it, (2) a change in adoption policyand child-rearing that would enable people who "give up" babies for adoptionto have some influence over, and some direct knowledge of, their child'sdevelopment, (3) elimination of unfair discrimination, particularly jobdiscrimination, based on unwed motherhood and the stigma attaching to someone'sbeing an "illegitimate" child, and (4) a change in the way we view theresponsibility for rearing children, both in regard to financial obligations,and in regard to their moral, physical, and academic education. I wishto consider these four social changes because it seems to me that theywould drastically reduce the number of abortions by reducing many people'sfeeling of need for an abortion as their only alternative to a very unhappyor wrongful birth. And to eliminate or reduce abortions voluntarily, byeliminating or reducing the (perceived) need for them, would be a goodthing.

Laws against abortion do not stop abortion; they just make them less safe.

abortion/pro-life Academic Essay | Write My Academic Essay

I’m sure that being raped by someone in your family can bring on lots of stress & confusion, so it is completely understandable why most would get abortions under this circumstance....

Nowadays, Abortion is a controversial problem as people think of appropriateness.

Abortion Pro-Life - Essay Samples

First, abortion is always a bad thing because it does end a unique,particular life or a very near, potential life; yet it may not be the wrongthing, since it may be the best alternative of a bunch of bad alternatives,or it may be the result of a right that overrides a greater good. Someright actions in life are those which involve bad things, for example whensomeone has to have their leg amputated in order to save their life, orwhen someone has to have prolonged and painful treatment to prevent rabieswhen the dog who bit them cannot be found. A bad option can be the rightoption to choose in making a decision if it (1) is based on a right thatoverrides other actions or if it (2) is the best option open to the agentwho will perform the action and is an option that does not violate someoverriding right. An example concerning such an overriding right, usuallygiven in ethics classes, is the right of an innocent person not to be punishedfor a crime authorities know he did not commit but could frame him forto the public, just in order to deter future potential criminals, evenif that were to save countless future victims. Innocent people have a rightnot to be punished just to serve as an example of what would happen toa person guilty of a particular kind of crime, regardless of how much betterconditions would be if some innocent person was occasionally punished,or even executed, that way. Hence, with regard to abortion, abortion ofa fetus (which leads to its death) may be right if it is the best of abunch of bad alternatives available, or if there is some overriding reasonor some other right which overrides the fetal right to life, as in thecase where the mother's life is in jeopardy if she carries the child longenough for it to be viable (i.e., the mother's right of self-defense).Likewise abortion would be wrong if it is not the best alternative and/orif the fetus has a right to life overriding alternatives even though thosealternatives may make others better off in the long run. So the questioncomes to whether there are better alternatives than termination of thefetus or not, and whether in different cases there are rights which overridethe best alternatives -- either on behalf of the fetus when terminationgives the better situation for others, or on behalf of others when non-terminationgives the better situation for the fetus and/or those other than the geneticparent(s).